Kintex 7 MIPI DSI 10.1” LCD
If this project is constructive, welcome to donate a drink to PayPal.
or
paypal.me/briansune
More MIPI DSI LCD examples
Please visit FPGA-TFT-MIPI-or-DPI or FPGA-LCD-MIPI-or-DPI
Background
In the past, many Xilinx FPGA developers and users wanted to utilize the “MIPI DSI TX Controller Subsystem” IP.
Unfortunately, due to the absence of LPDT, users were unable to initialize the LCD/TFT display. Hence, the usefulness of this built-in Vivado IP was highly limited.
In this project, a novel, ultra-low-resource, Verilog-based HDL design has been developed to address this niche need.
This design requires neither a softcore nor a hardcore (using only pure FSM + LUT), significantly reducing complexity.
Additionally, the design is independent of Vivado IP (excluding inherent FPGA building blocks) and does not require a DPHY IP either.
Demonstration
Test Patterns
BPP,FPS,FPGA,Lanes,I/F | Video |
---|---|
16, 60,K7,4,R-Net | ![]() |
24, 60,K7,4,R-Net | ![]() |
Experiment findings
According to Xilinx and Intel document, users are required to control the length between FPGA differential I/O to LCD/TFT I/F must kept as short as possible.
However, in this 10.1" LCD experiment, it is not necessary to maintain a short cable length.
Trade-off can be made between length of the cable and MIPI-DSI clock frequency, which this LCD is using a long cable (200 mm) @clock freq. 500Mbps.
How to obtain the design?
Please contact via EMAIL: briansune@gmail.com
How to Use?
1) Modify the Python script and convert the initialization LPDT ROM (read-only-memory) 2) Make sure the hardware is MIPI DSI supported. Xilinx FPGA please check HERE or Altera FPGA please check HERE 3) Make sure the MMCM and parameters are converged 4) Ensure the MIPI Mbps is lower than 900, which is tested on the 5.5 inch 1080p TFT 60 FPS.
Hardware
Description | EVM |
---|---|
FPGA K7-R-Net | |
10.1” LCD |
Project Resource
BPP,FPS,FPGA,Lanes | Resources |
---|---|
16,60,K7,4 | ![]() |
24,60,K7,4 | ![]() |
Project Heirachy
Remarks 1: Ultrascale+ devices and 7 series have different serialization building blocks.
Remarks 2: Ultrascale+ devices have MIPI physical interface, which no extra resistor-network or front-end ICs are needed.
Remarks 3: The only Verilog design that are changed to cope with Ultrascale+ device are the serialization and MMCM blocks.
|-mipi_init_script
| |-main.py
| |-mipi_setup_rom.mem
| |-one_lane_lcd.txt
|-mipi_phys
| |-mipi_crc.v
| |-mipi_ecc.v
| |-mipi_hs_clk_phy.v
| |-mipi_hs_phy.v
| |-mipi_lps_phy.v
|-mipi_refclks
| |-mipi_refclks.v
|-mipi_setup
| |-mipi_lpdt_setup.v
| |-mipi_reset.v
| |-mipi_setup_rom.mem
|-mipi_sim
| |-tb_mipi_setup.v
| |-tb_mipi_top.v
| |-tb_mipi_video.v
|-mipi_top.v
|-top.xdc
|-video_src
| |-mipi_long_vid_pack.v
| |-mipi_remap.v
| |-mipi_short_vid_hdr.v
| |-mipi_video_stream.v
| |-test_pattern_gen.v
| |-video_timing_ctrl.v